TA：快船内外部人士都认为，阴阳合同事件不会被查出任何违规（TA：快船队内外普遍认为，“阴阳合同”风波最终不会查出违规）

Considering scenarios and outcomes

I want to outline possible scenarios for violations: no violation, minor circumvention resulting in fines or loss of draft picks, and serious violations leading to voided deals. It’s important to clarify what evidence is needed to prove wrongdoing and what impact this might have on the Clippers going forward. I should ask what specific information would be helpful. Although I could pull current English news if the network is enabled, it’s a straightforward task. I’ll skip running commands and just reply concisely in Chinese.Crafting a concise response

I'll start by summarizing the meaning of this situation and explaining "阴阳合同" (shadow contracts) in the NBA context. The investigation is ongoing, with reports indicating the league is looking into it, and the Clippers are cooperating, but no evidence or penalties have surfaced yet. I can't definitively say the league has initiated an investigation, so I should hedge it a bit.

Insiders might believe no violations can be proved because all compensation must be reported through standard contracts. If there is wrongdoing, consequences could include fines or loss of draft picks. I’ll cite examples like the Joe Smith case as precedents. Finally, I should ask the user if they'd like a timeline or a list of key salary cap rules related to this.